Oh boy, here we go again Results 1 to 6 of 6 Thread: Intel may make changes to the Software, or to items referenced therein, at any time without notice, but is not obligated to support or update the Software. Notice, it has a NAME. Did you find the information on this site useful? Claims arising under this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of California, excluding its principles of conflict of laws and the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the Sale of Goods.
|Date Added:||18 September 2015|
|File Size:||32.89 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
These three mobo makers tend to make the better boards. Thu Mar 22, 7: Oh boy, here we go again From the two reviews of the cusl2-c which is the i15e derivitive, they have actually seen better performance in comparison to thier origional part.
Feb 12, Posts: Your comments have been sent. Actually, I read somewhere that Intel is only producing iE chipsets and selling the ones where the integrated video doesn’t work as iEP to make money off products that otherwise would go to waste.
VIA vs Intel vs SiS – Ars Technica OpenForum
You may copy the Software onto your organization’s computers for your organization’s use, and you may make a reasonable number of back-up copies of the Software, subject to these conditions: Mar 18, Posts: You may transfer the Software only if the recipient agrees to be fully bound by these terms and if you retain no copies of the Software. And there is nothing wrong with it.
Fri Mar 23, Last Chioset Intel finally revealed the long awaited Chipse 4, but it felt more like a product preview than a real competitor to AMD Athlon.
You may have to register before you can post: Results 1 to 6 of 6 Thread: They’re the same chipset core,the only difference is that the iE has integrated video and the iEP doesn’t. Oct 29, Posts: If you don’t mind spending the extra cash on your processor, get an Intel chipset I don’t know which one though.
Intel is not obligated under any other agreements unless they are in writing i85e signed by an authorized representative of Intel. My rule of thumb is simple. Intel R and chipset family graphics driver exe Version: Title to all copies of the Software remains with Intel or its suppliers.
EPoX EP-3SPA3 i815EP Socket-370 ATX
With the Pentium 4 not being the right choice yet for the majority of users, people will still have to stick with the Pentium III chips if they want to xhipset with Intel through the early part of at least. Use of the Software in conjunction with non-Intel component products is not licensed hereunder. Intel may terminate this Agreement at any time if you violate its terms. Jan 11, Posts: That’s common in semiconductor products–disable a feature and charge a little less. Index The Layout The Basics I no this question has been prob asked be4.
Jan 3, Posts: Such license agreement may be a “break-the- seal” license agreement. Sat Mar 24, 5: Feb 15, Posts: Thu Mar 22, 5: Let’s find out if EPoX has been able to make this board a solid one, while still lowering the price.
Stephen Ars Praetorian Registered: